Final Report on Minimum Safeguards
Published 6 January 2023
Category: Impact and ESG
The European Commission expert group; Platform on Sustainable Finance, has published a final report on the minimum safeguards laid out in Article 3 and 18 of the Taxonomy Regulation. It replaces the draft report published in July 2022.
In general, the final report advises on the application of the minimum safeguards. It covers the following main areas:
- The embedding of minimum safeguards in the existing EU regulation (the SFDR, CSDDD, CSRD as well as initiatives on corruption, fair competition and taxation),
- The identification of topics that relate to the norms and standards touched upon in Article 18 of the Taxonomy Regulation, and
- Advice on the compliance with the minimum safeguards
Minimum safeguards are one of the criteria used to determine if an economic activity qualifies as environmentally sustainable. These criteria are listed in Article 3 in the Taxonomy Regulation. Minimum safeguards are further described in Article 18 in the Taxonomy Regulation, according to which minimum safeguards are procedures implemented by companies carrying out economic activities to ensure alignment with standards for human and labour rights. The standards are defined in the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (OECD Guidelines for MNE), the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), the eight fundamental conventions identified in the Declaration of the International Labour Organisation on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work as well as the International Bill of Human Rights.
The expert group has identified four core topics which shall be used to determine compliance with minimum safeguards:
- Human rights (including labour and consumer rights)
- Corruption (Bribery, bribe solicitation and extortion)
- Taxation
- Fair competition
The advice given by the expert group on the above four topics are based on the standards outlined in Article 18 in the Taxonomy Regulation as well as existing and upcoming EU regulation. Among others, the report draws parallels to the CSDDD and CSRD. They are, to some extent, used as a means of guidance for determining compliance with the minimum safeguards. When CSDDD and CSRD are finalized and some experience has been made, the expert group expects a further revision. The report also gives advice for, among others, banks, sub-sovereigns and smaller companies such as SMEs falling outside the direct scope of CSDDD and CSRD.
Below, the minimum safeguards alignment criteria within the four core topics are elaborated upon:
- Human rights: The human rights due diligence process is central to minimum safeguards and to ensuring that undertakings have relevant procedures implemented as required in Article 18 of the Taxonomy Regulation. The report determines two overall criteria indicating non-compliance with minimum safeguards: 1) If the company has not established sufficient human rights due diligence processes as referred to in the UNGPs and OECD Guidelines for MNE, 2) there are clear indications that the company does not have sufficient human rights due diligence process implemented, resulting in human rights abuses. A company is considered non-compliant with minimum safeguards and the Taxonomy if one of the criteria is applicable. Specifically for SMEs, they should be considered non-compliant if either the company does not have a due diligence process proportionate to its leverage, size and risks, or if the company has breached human, labour or consumer rights.
- Corruption: The report sets out two criteria for being aligned with minimum safeguards in relation to corruption. A company is not compliant with the safeguards if one of the criteria applies: 1) The company has not developed or adopted sufficient compliance and ethics programs, internal controls or any prevention measures, 2) the undertaking or senior management, also senior management of any subsidiaries, has been convicted for corruption or bribery and it is final. In relation to SMEs, they are considered non-compliant if they have been finally convicted of corruption.
- Taxation: The same process as for human rights and corruption can be followed when identifying sufficient procedures for establishing compliance with minimum safeguards. The report proposes the following criteria for a company’s alignment with minimum safeguards: 1) The company does not find tax governance and compliance to be important elements of oversight and no sufficient tax risk management processes and strategies as described in OECD MNE Guidelines on tax are established, 2) the company is guilty of tax evasion. Again, an undertaking does not comply with the minimum safeguards if one of the criteria applies. Specifically for SMEs, non-compliance require that the company has been finally convicted for tax evasion.
- Fair competition: The report has formulated the following two recommended criteria for a company’s alignment with minimum safeguards. Therefore, an undertaking is not compliant with the safeguards if just one of the criteria applies: 1) The company does not train senior management on competition issues and neither does it promote the awareness with employees around the importance of being compliant with competition regulations, 2) the undertaking or senior management, also senior management of any subsidiaries, has breached competition laws. Again, for SMEs, they will be non-compliant with the minimum safeguards in case they have breached competition law and been finally convicted in court.
The final report does not bind the Commission, however, it will be subject for analysis and serves as an information basis. The full report can be accessed here.
Tags: ComplianceSustainability
Also tagged ‘Compliance’
Memo from the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority on periodic reporting
On 30 August 2023, the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (“DFSA”) published a memo describing the requirements in SFDR art. 11 for periodic reporting.
ComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityUpdated guide on the SFDR and Taxonomy Regulation
The updated guide takes regulation and guidance from public consultations and Q&A’s since July 2022 into account. Further, it reflects the most recent market practice on the application of the regulations.
ComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityThematic review of sustainability disclosures for funds with sustainable investment as the objective
On 3 February 2023, the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (“DFSA”) published a thematic review of sustainability disclosures for eight funds with sustainable investments as their objective.
ComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityPublic consultation on the update of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
In general, the Guidelines, last updated in 2011, are a set of non-binding recommendations to businesses for ensuring responsible business conduct in all areas where business interacts with society.
ComplianceGovernanceSustainabilityESMA consultation on the use of ESG or sustainability-related terms in fund names
On 20 February 2023, ESMA closed their consultation on Guidelines on funds' names using ESG or sustainability-related terms launched back in November 2022.
ComplianceESMASustainabilityOpinions issued on the draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) submitted a draft set of European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS Set 1) to the EU Commission in November 2022.
ComplianceESMASustainabilityRequirements for Gender Composition in Managements have Tightened
On 1 January 2023 new rules have imposed stricter requirements for targets and policies on the gender composition of managements. These rules cover both large Danish companies (covered by accounting class C), including state-owned and some listed companies (covered by accounting class D), as well as certain companies within the financial area
ComplianceDanish RegulationSustainabilityFinal Adoption of the CSRD
The CSRD has now been finally adopted after the Council of the European Union on 28 November 2022 approved the European Parliament’s position. On 16 December 2022, the directive was published in the Official Journal. The date of entry into force is 20 days from the publication date.
ComplianceSustainabilityCSRD has been Passed by the European Parliament
The European Parliament has passed the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”). CSRD replaces the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (“NFRD”), and introduces higher requirements of more detailed reporting, and a mandatory EU sustainability reporting standard.
ComplianceSustainabilityNew Guide on SFDR and EU Taxonomy Regulation
Invest Europe has published a comprehensive members guide on EU ESG reporting requirements for fund managers to clarify grey areas that exist around the day-to-day application of the regulation.
ComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityAuthorised AIFMs’ Integration of Sustainability Factors and Risks Applies from 1 August 2022
Authorized AIFMs shall from 1 August 2022 ensure that their systems, processes, and internal controls reflect relevant sustainability risks as defined in the SFDR.
AIFMDComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityFinal Regulatory Technical Standards for SFDR and Taxonomy Regulation are Published
The RTS will define the new standard for sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector in the EU and supplements provisions of the SFDR and of the Taxonomy Regulation.
AIFMDComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityInvest Europe to set ESG Reporting Standards
In November 2021, Invest Europe released its Climate Ambition in which the association committed to contribute to the EU becoming climate-neutral by 2050 and pledged to help the P/E and VC industry move towards net zero.
AIFMDComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityThe Danish FSA: Significant Room for Improvement for SFDR Disclosures
The Danish FSA has assessed the quality of 4 pension companies and eight credit institutions' website disclosures with regards to information about their policies on the integration of sustainability risks in the investment decision-making process.
AIFMDComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityApplication of SFDR Level 2 Obligations Delayed (Again)
The European Commission has once again delayed the application of the level 2 obligations of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) until January 2023.
AIFMDComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityCommission Delays Application Date for the ESG Disclosure and Taxonomy Regulations
The Commission has postponed the date of application of the detailed regulatory technical standards (RTS) under the ESG Disclosure Regulation and the Taxonomy Regulation by six months from 1 January 2022 to 1 July 2022.
ComplianceCross-BorderDanish RegulationCommission Clarifies Questions of Interpretation Regarding ESG Disclosures
The Commission has answered a number of questions from the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) regarding the ESG Disclosure Regulation.
ComplianceCross-BorderDanish RegulationNew Danish Act on Screening of Foreign Direct Investments
The new act on control of foreign direct investments (the “Act”) was adopted on 4th May 2021. The Act introduces a new framework for government screening of foreign investments and certain types of agreements with Danish companies.
ComplianceCross-BorderDanish RegulationESA Publishes Joint Supervisory Statement on the Interpretation on Fund Managers’ ESG Disclosure Obligations
From 10 March 2021, fund managers are required to make certain ESG disclosures available on their website and in their pre-contractual disclosures to investors.
AIFMDComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityDeferral of Certain DAC6-Related Time Limits
On 29 June 2020, the Danish minister of taxation issued an executive order which defers certain DAC6-related time limits.
ComplianceDAC6ESA Consults on Fund Managers’ ESG Disclosure Obligations
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESA) has published draft technical standards setting out detailed rules on i.a. fund managers’ obligations under the ESG Disclosure Regulation.
AIFMDComplianceDisclosure RequirementsSustainabilityCommission Proposes Deferral of Certain DAC6-Related Time Limits
Due to the COVID-19 crisis, the European Commission has put forward a proposal for a directive that will defer certain time limits of DAC6, the EU directive regarding mandatory reporting in relation to arrangements with cross-border implications.
ComplianceDAC6Call to Defer DAC6 Reporting
A group of financial associations, including Invest Europe, has requested a deferral of the DAC6 reporting obligation until 2021 across all member states and the UK.
ComplianceDAC6Proposal to Transpose DAC6 into Danish Law Presented in the Danish Parliament
On 6 November 2019 the Danish government presented its proposal to transpose the EU directive regarding mandatory reporting in relation to arrangements with cross-border implications (“DAC6”) into Danish law.
ComplianceDAC6Disclosure RequirementsProposal to Increase Certain Requirements for Managers under the AIFM and AML Act Published for Consultation
On 28 August 2019 the Danish FSA (in Danish: Finanstilsynet) published for consultation a draft proposal to change, among others, the Danish AIFM Act and the Danish AML Act.
ComplianceDanish RegulationKYC / AMLWhistleblowingJapan Deemed a Sector Specific, Safe Third Country by the Danish DPA
Transfer of personal data from Denmark to (private) organisations in Japan that are subject to the APPI will not require prior approval from the DPA.
ComplianceDanish RegulationGDPRDanish Company Faces Prosecution and a Fine of DKK 1.5 mill. for GDPR Violation
On 11 June 2019, the Danish Data Protection Agency ("DPA") has reported a Danish furniture company to the Danish police for not deleting information on approx. 385,000 customers.
ComplianceDanish RegulationGDPRDAC6 Expected to be Transposed into Danish Law in Second Half of 2019
DAC6, the new EU directive regarding mandatory reporting in relation to arrangements with cross-border implications DAC6, will increase reporting requirements for arrangements that have cross-border implications.
ComplianceDAC6Disclosure RequirementsOther updates
EU’s new Anti-Money Laundering package announced
On 19 June 2024 EU’s new Anti-Money Laundering package was announced. The new AML package has been long in the making, and the Commission presented its package of legislative proposals as early as July 2021.
KYC / AMLFinal reports from ESMA, EBA and EIOPA on greenwashing in the financial sector
The European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) has published their final reports on greenwashing in the financial sector.
SustainabilityProposal for new strategy on entrepreneurship in Denmark
As set out in Pulse update on 13 June 2024, the Danish government has presented a proposal regarding entrepreneurship in Denmark, which includes initiatives aimed at creating better access to capital for startups, cutting the burden of red tape on business and certain relaxation of taxes.
Venture CapitalAdoption of the Net Zero Industry Act
The European Council has adopted the Net Zero Industry Act: a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology products manufacturing ecosystem.
SustainabilityFinal Report from ESMA with guidelines on funds’ names
The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a final report containing guidelines on funds’ names using ESG or sustainability-related terms.
ESMASustainabilityProposal for new strategy on entrepreneurship in Denmark
On 12 June 2024, the Danish government presented a proposal regarding entrepreneurship in Denmark, which includes initiatives aimed at creating better access to capital for startups and certain relaxation of taxes.
Venture Capital